# gate · Export Shipment Gate (English edition)
Original Chinese edition: https://gate.lightbdb.com/ · Version 1.0 · 2026-10-18

> Twelve binary checks between a purchase order and a loaded container, across four gates:
> Z admission, A order intake, B production, C release. Preceded by one evidence law:
> a document counts only with a revision (controlled number + revision), two signatures
> (the judge and the reviewer) and a number that traces back to the batch. Missing any
> one, the verdict is Unclear. Verdicts are three, not two: Pass / Fail / Unclear, and
> Unclear must leave with one person and one date.
>
> Maintained by LIGHT BDB (轻无品牌设计（深圳）有限公司). Free to cite with source and version. English and
> Chinese editions share identical numbering; anchors are stable across versions.

## Scope

Covers: purchase order to container loaded; four moments (admission, order intake, production, release);
the evidence form and deciding role at each.
Excludes: social-compliance audits (BSCI/SMETA/WRAP/RBA), payment and trade compliance, origin and duty,
after-sales and claims, product safety certification, factory capability rating.

## Use

1. Apply the evidence law to the main document for the gate you are in.
2. Run only that gate's three checks. Do not run twelve at once.
3. Record verdicts per check; assign one person and one date to every Unclear.
4. Print the record sheet: https://gate.lightbdb.com/en/form.html

## The twelve checks (with basis grade)

- [Z-01 · Z · grade A] Is the last audit still valid for this order? — Within the past 12 months, was there an audit scoped to the same process as this order, with a conclusion other than “rejected”?
- [Z-02 · Z · grade A] Who holds the written right to stop? — Is the quality lead independent of production, and does that person hold a written authority to stop the line or stop a shipment, naming the trigger conditions and the signatory?
- [Z-03 · Z · grade A] Is the acceptance basis a controlled document? — Is there a controlled inspection standard for this order: document number, revision, three signatures (prepared, checked, approved), and a revision history?
- [A-01 · A · grade B] Is the ship date calculated, or promised? — Is the schedule derived from standard time per key process × quantity + buffer, and does a written schedule exist with start and end dates for each key process?
- [A-02 · A · grade B] Have the requirements collapsed into one document? — Are model, revision, destination-country access requirements and packaging artwork revision written on one document, with exactly one revision in force?
- [A-03 · A · grade A] Does the acceptance basis come from one source? — Do defect classification (CR / MAJ / MIN), sampling plan and inspection method come from the same document, at the same revision as this order's specification?
- [B-01 · B · grade A] Was the first article approved before mass production? — Was the first article approved before mass production began, with a first-article report, comparison photos against the sealed sample, and a date?
- [B-02 · B · grade A] Is the station holding this order's work instruction? — Does every key process have a controlled SOP (number, revision, signature), and is the revision the one this order requires?
- [B-03 · B · grade B] Is every change traceable? — For any change in material, supplier, tooling or process, is there a change notice, a re-validation conclusion, and customer confirmation?
- [C-01 · C · grade A] Does the release report name its basis? — Does the pre-shipment inspection report cite what it judged against (document number and revision), with CR / MAJ / MIN columns filled — including zeros?
- [C-02 · C · grade A] Do quantity and lot number agree in three places? — Do lot number, production date and carton count agree across the inspection report, the packing list and the carton marking?
- [C-03 · C · grade C] Are the documents and the goods the same lot? — Do invoice, packing list, customs declaration and bill of lading agree on description, quantity, value, gross and net weight, and destination port — and agree with the goods?

Grade A = traces to a line in a real sample document (8). B = indirect, cause documented but
corrected practice not (3). C = awaiting sample (1). Grades are published so the document can be
attacked in the right place.

## Open questions (deliberately unresolved)

- Q1 Cosmetic judgement by surface zone or by defect count (affects A-03, C-01)
- Q2 When sampling tightens: no trigger condition is written (affects A-03, C-01)
- Q3 Who is the final signatory of stop-shipment authority (affects Z-02, C-01)

## Citation

Per gate Export Shipment Gate v1.0, criterion C-01 (https://gate.lightbdb.com/en/#C-01)
Anchor pattern: https://gate.lightbdb.com/en/#<criterion-id>. Cite with the version number.

## Machine-readable

- English JSON: https://gate.lightbdb.com/criteria.en.json
- Chinese original: https://gate.lightbdb.com/ and https://gate.lightbdb.com/criteria.json
- Record sheet: https://gate.lightbdb.com/en/form.html
- Version and basis: https://gate.lightbdb.com/en/changelog.html
- PDF (Chinese edition, 12 pages): https://gate.lightbdb.com/gate-v1.0.pdf

## Not promised

Does not guarantee acceptance; does not replace third-party inspection or statutory certification;
not calibrated for every destination or category; not legal or compliance advice; does not rate a factory.

---

## 中文版摘要（与英文版同一版本，编号一致）

### gate · 出海作业判定（ExWorks Gate Criteria）

> 一单货从下单到上船，12 个必须过的判断。四道闸（准入 Z / 接单 A / 量产 B / 放行 C），
> 每条判据只回答一个二值问题，并指定证据形态、责任岗位、记录要求与「不过怎么办」。
> 前置一条证据律：一份东西要算「有证据」，必须同时有版本（受控文件编号+版次）、
> 有签字（判定人与复核人两个名字）、有编号（批号/报告号，可倒查到这一批）。缺一即判「说不清」。
> 判定只有三态：过 / 不过 / 说不清。「说不清」必须在当场指派一个人加一个日期。

版本：v1.0  ／  发布：2026-10-18  ／  维护：轻无品牌设计（深圳）有限公司  ／  许可：可自由引用，转载注明来源与版本号

## 范围

覆盖：从客户下单到货上船这一段作业；四类节点（准入·接单·量产·放行）；每一节点的判定依据与证据形态。
不覆盖：体系认证与社会责任审厂取证（BSCI/SMETA/WRAP/RBA）、收汇与贸易合规、售后与索赔、产品安规测试与发证、工厂能力评价。

## 关键定义

- 受控文件：有编号、有版次、有制订/审核/批准三签、有发行管制，修订走变更单。不受控 = 每份都能自称最新版 = 没有一份有效。
- 首件：量产开始之前、用正式工装材料工艺做出的前若干件。价值在时点，不在数量。量产中补做等于没有首件。
- 封样：客户或工程签认、带编号与日期的实物基准件。没有封样编号的比对照片，只能证明「像」。
- 批号：能把记录倒查回这一批货的编号。没有批号只能证明「那天有人检验过」，不能证明「这批货过了」。
- 说不清：现有证据既不足以判过也不足以判不过。它不是中间态，是必须当场落人落日的待办。

## 12 条判据（含依据等级）

- [Z-01 准入 · A] 最近 12 个月内是否有以本单同类工艺为对象的审厂，结论非「拒」
- [Z-02 准入 · A] 质量负责人独立于生产，且持书面停线/停出货授权（含触发条件与签字人）
- [Z-03 准入 · A] 本单对应的检验标准是受控文件（编号+版次+批准/审核/制订三签+修订履历）
- [A-01 接单 · B] 交期由关键工序标准工时×批量+缓冲倒推，有书面排期
- [A-02 接单 · B] 客户要求收敛为一份唯一有效的规格书（型号/版本/目的国准入/包装稿版本）
- [A-03 接单 · A] 缺陷分级 CR/MAJ/MIN、抽样方案、检验方法与本单规格书同源同版
- [B-01 量产 · A] 首件在量产之前确认，有报告+封样比对照片+日期
- [B-02 量产 · A] 每道关键工序有受控 SOP（编号+版次+签名）挂于工位且与本单一致
- [B-03 量产 · B] 材料/供应商/模具/工艺任一变更有变更单+重新验证结论+客户确认
- [C-01 放行 · A] 出货检验报告写明判定基准（引用文件编号与版次），CR/MAJ/MIN 三栏不空
- [C-02 放行 · A] 批号/生产日期/箱数在检验报告—装箱单—外箱标三处一致
- [C-03 放行 · C] 发票/装箱单/报关/提单的品名、数量、金额、毛净重、目的港一致且与实物一致

依据等级：A＝样本文件里能直接指到那一行（8 条）；B＝间接证据，同一病因不同表现（3 条）；C＝尚无样本支撑，待验证（1 条）。
等级公开标注的目的不是显严谨，是为了让它可以被质疑。

## 存疑（公开未定）

- Q1 外观判定按「面」分级还是按「形态」计数（影响 A-03、C-01）
- Q2 抽样何时加严（连续不合格批数 / 客诉后 / 新供应商首批 / 换料后）（影响 A-03、C-01）
- Q3 停出货权的最终签字人（品保负责人 / 厂长 / 老板本人）（影响 Z-02、C-01）

## 治理

维护人为单一署名，不设委员会。每季度改一次，每次只动 3–5 条。
提案须同时给一份可脱敏的真实样本 + 一句能复核的判读。争议不投票，看样本；
两份冲突时取被第三方复核过的那一份，都复核过则并列进存疑。
连续两个版本无人引用也无人争议的条目降为参考条目；被真实事故证伪的直接撤回并写明原因。

## 页面与机器可读

- 判据正文：https://gate.lightbdb.com/
- 怎么用（三态判定、四种假证据、五个常见误判、三步十五分钟）：https://gate.lightbdb.com/how.html
- 判定记录表（一页 A4，12 格，可打印）：https://gate.lightbdb.com/form.html
- 版本与依据（含依据等级分布与故意未收录的四类）：https://gate.lightbdb.com/changelog.html
- 机器可读（JSON，含每条判据的问题/通过/记录/处置/岗位/等级）：https://gate.lightbdb.com/criteria.json

## 引用格式

依 gate 出海作业判定 v1.0 第 C-01 条（gate.lightbdb.com/#C-01）
每条判据的编号即锚点，锚点不随版本变化。引用请带版本号。

## 不承诺

不保证通过任何客户的验收；不替代第三方检验与法定认证；不保证适用于所有目的国与品类；
不构成法律或合规意见；不评价工厂好坏与能力上限。